Sari la conținut
Postat

The Deadly Art Of Stock Manipulation

______________________________

HOT STOCKS

CONFIDENTIAL ESSAY

 

By George Chelekis

 

NOTE: I believe this may be one of the most important essays on the financial markets which you will ever read. This essay will be

the lead article in Hot Stocks Review, (Part Two). Up until recently, I knew that I was missing something, but I could not

quite put my finger on it. Now I know what it is. The data which follows is only as good as you can actually use it. These are the cold, savage and ruthless facts of market manipulation. I have not made these up, but have dug them up out of out-dated, generally unavailable books on Canadian market manipulations, and pieced the rest together from observations, personal experiences and conversations with market professionals and insiders. While the books are out of date, the manipulations have been passed down from one generation to another. The only thing missing was someone to supply you with what those tricks were so you can become a more educated speculator. Many thanks to Robert Short and Vern Flannery, of Market News Publishing, for finding and sending me a copy of the book, "The Story Behind Canadian Mining Speculation" by T. H. Mitchell, first published in 1957 by George J. McLeod Limited; also Ivan Shaffer's book, "The Stock Promotion Game." I have been told that many of these tricks are now illegal. If so, would someone please tell that to the market manipulators.

 

THE DEADLY ART OF STOCK MANIPULATION....

 

In every profession, there are probably a dozen or two major rules. Knowing them cold is what separates the professional from the

amateur. Not knowing them at all? Well, let's put it this way: How safe would you feel if you suddenly found yourself piloting (solo) a Boeing 747 as it were landing on an airstrip? Unless you are a professional pilot, you would probably be frightened out of your wits and would soil your underwear. Hold that thought as you read this essay because I will explain to you how market manipulation works.

 

In order to successfully speculate, one should presume the following: THE SMALL CAP STOCK MARKETS PRIMARILY EXIST TO FLEECE YOU! I'm talking about Vancouver, Alberta, the Canadian Dealing Network and the US Over-the Counter markets (Pink Sheets, Bulletin Board, etc.). One could also stretch this, with many stocks, to include the world's senior stock markets, including Toronto, New York, NASDAQ, London, etc. The average investor or speculator is not very likely to have much success in the small cap crapshoots. I guess that is what attracted ME to these markets. I have been trying, for quite some time, to answer this question, "How come?" Now, I know. And you should, too!

 

By the way, the premise of these books is uniformly: "While these speculative companies do not actually make any money, one can profit by speculating in these companies." THAT is the premise on how these markets are run, by both the stock promoters, insiders, brokers, analysts and others in this industry. That logic is flawed in that it presumes "someone else" is going to end up holding the dirty bag. Follow this premise all the way through and you will realize the insane conclusion: For these markets to continue along that route, new suckers have to continue coming into the marketplace. The conclusion is insane in that such mad activity can only be short-lived. I disagree with this premise and propose another solution (see my earlier essay: A Modest Proposal) at the end of this essay.

 

What the professionals and the securities regulators know and understand, which the rest of us do not, is this.

 

"RULE NUMBER ONE: ALL SHARP PRICE MOVEMENTS -- WHETHER UP OR DOWN -- ARE THE RESULT OF ONE OR MORE (USUALLY A GROUP OF) PROFESSIONALS MANIPULATING THE SHARE PRICE."

 

This should explain why a mining company finds something good and "nothing happens" or the stock goes down. At the same

time, for NO apparent reason, a stock suddenly takes off for the sky! On little volume! Someone is manipulating that stock, often with an unfounded rumor.

 

In order to make these market manipulations work, the professionals assume: (a) The Public is STUPID and (b) The Public

will mainly buy at the HIGH and © The Public will sell at the LOW.

Therefore, as long as the market manipulator can run crowd control, he can be successful.

 

Let's face it: The reason you speculate in such markets is that you are greedy AND optimistic. You believe in a better tomorrow and NEED to make money quickly. It is this sentiment which is exploited by the market manipulator. He controls YOUR greed and fear about a particular stock. If he wants you to buy, the company's prospects look like the next Microsoft. If the manipulator wants you to desert the sinking ship, he suddenly becomes very guarded in his remarks about the company, isn't around to glowingly answer questions about the company and/or GETS issued very bad news about the company. Which brings us to the next important rule.

 

"RULE NUMBER TWO: IF THE MARKET MANIPULATOR WANTS TO DISTRIBUTE (DUMP) HIS SHARES, HE WILL START A GOOD NEWS PROMOTIONAL CAMPAIGN."

 

Ever wonder why a particular company is made to look like the greatest thing since sliced bread? That sentiment is manufactured.

Newsletter writers are hired -- either secretly or not -- to cheerlead a stock. PR firms are hired and let loose upon an unsuspecting public. Contracts to appear on radio talk shows are signed and implemented. Stockbrokers get "cheap" stock to recommend the company to their "book" (that means YOU, the client in his book). An advertising campaign is rolled out (television ads, newspaper ads, card deck mailings). The company signs up to exhibit at "investment conferences" and "gold shows" (mainly so they can get a little "podium time" to hype you on their stock and tell you how "their company is really different" and "not a stock promotion.") Funny little "hype" messages are posted on Internet newsgroups by the same cast of usual suspects. The more, the merrier. And a little "juice" can go a long way toward running up the stock price.

 

The HYPE is on. The more clever a stock promoter, the better his knowledge of the advertising business. Little gimmicks like

"positioning" are used. Example: Make a completely unknown company look warm and fuzzy and appealing to you by comparing it

to a recent success story, Diamond Fields or Bre-X Minerals. That is the POSITIONING gospel, authored by Ries and Trout (famous for "Avis: We Want To Be #1" and "We Try Harder" and other such slogans). These advertising/PR executives must have stumbled onto this formula after losing their shirts speculating in a few Canadian stock promotions! The only reason you have been invited to this seemingly incredible banquet is that YOU are the main course. After the market manipulator has suckered you into "his investment," exchanging HIS paper for YOUR cash, the walls begin to close in on you. Why is that?

 

 

The Deadly Art Of Stock Manipulation Pt2

________________________________________

"RULE NUMBER THREE: AS SOON AS THE MARKET MANIPULATOR HAS COMPLETED HIS DISTRIBUTION (DUMPING) OF SHARES, HE WILL START A BAD NEWS OR NO NEWS CAMPAIGN."

 

Your favorite home-run stock has just stalled or retreated a bit from its high. Suddenly, there is a news VACUUM. Either NO news or BAD rumors. I discovered this with quite a few stocks. I would get LOADS of information and "hot tips." All of a sudden, my pipeline was shut-off. Some companies would even issue a news release CONDEMNING me ("We don't need 'that kind of hype' referring to me!). Cute, huh? When the company wanted fantastic hype circulated hither and yon, there would be someone there to spoon-feed me. The second the distribution phase was DONE....ooops! Sorry, no more news. Or, "I'm sorry. He's not in the office." Or, "He won't be back until Monday."

 

The really slick market manipulators would even seed the Internet news groups or other journalists to plant negative stories

about that company. Or start a propaganda campaign of negative rumors on all available communication vehicles. Even hiring a

"contrarian" or "special PR firm" to drive down the price. Even hiring someone to attack the guy who had earlier written glowingly about the company. (This is not a game for the faint-hearted!)

 

You'll also see the stock drifting endlessly. You may even experience a helpless feeling, as if you were floating in outer space

without a lifeline. That is exactly HOW the market manipulator wants you to feel. See Rule Number Five below. He may also be doing this to avoid the severe disappointment of a "dry hole" or a "failed deal." You'll hear that oft-cried refrain, "Oh well, that's the junior minerals exploration business... very risky!" Or the oft-quoted statistic, "Nine out of 10 businesses fail each year and this IS a Venture Capital Startup stock exchange." Don't think it wasn't contrived. If a geologist at a junior mining company wasn't optimistic and rosy in his promise of exploration success, he would be replaced by someone who was! Ditto for the high-tech deal, in a world awash with PhD's.

 

So, how do you know when you are being taken? Look again at

Rule #1. Inside that rule, a few other rules unfold which explain how

a stock price is manipulated.

 

"RULE NUMBER FOUR: ANY STOCK THAT TRADES HUGE VOLUME AT HIGHER PRICES SIGNALS THE DISTRIBUTION PHASE."

 

When there was less volume, the price was lower. Professionals were accumulating. After the price runs, the volume increases. The professionals bought low and sold high. The amateurs bought high (and will soon enough sell low). In older books about market manipulation and stock promotion, which I've recently studied, the markup price referred to THREE times higher than the floor. The floor is the launchpad for the stock. For example, if one looks at the stock price and finds a steady flatline on the stock's chart of around 10 cents, then that range is the FLOOR. Basically, the markup phase can go as high as the market manipulator is capable of taking it. From my observations, a good markup should be able to run about five to ten times higher than the floor, with six to seven being common. The market manipulator will do everything in his power to keep you OUT OF THE STOCK until the share price has been marked up by at least two-three times, sometimes resorting to "shaking you out" until after he has accumulated enough shares. Once the markup has begun, the stock chart will show you one or more spikes in the

volume -- all at much higher prices (marked up by the manipulator, of course). That is DISTRIBUTION and nothing else.

 

Example: Look at Software Control Systems (Alberta:XVN), in which I purchased shares after it had been marked up five times.

There were eight days of 500,000 (plus) shares trading hands, with one day of 750,000 shares trading hands. Market manipulator(s) dumping shares into the volume at higher prices. WHENEVER you see HUGE volume after the stock has risen on a 75 degree angle, the distribution phase has started and you are likely to be buying in -- at or near the stock's peak price.

 

Example: Look at Diamond Fields (TSE FR), which never increased at a 75 degree angle and did not have abnormal volume

spikes, yet in less than two years ran from C$4 to C$160/share.

 

Example: Look at Bre-X Minerals (Alberta:BXM), which did not experience its first 75 degree angle, with huge volume until July

14th, 1995. The next two trading days, BXM went down and stayed around C$12/share for two weeks. The volume had been 60% higher nearly a month earlier, with only a slight price increase. Each high volume and spectacular increase in BXM's share price was met with a price retreat and leveling off. "Suddenly," BXM wasn't trading at C$2/share; it was at C$170/share.... up 8500% in less than a year!

 

In both of the above cases, major Canadian newspapers ran extremely negative stories about both companies, at one time or

another. In each instance, just before another share price run up, retail investors fled the stock! Just before both began yet another

run up! Successful short-term speculators generally exit any stock run up when the volume soars; amateurs get greedy and buy at those points.

 

"RULE NUMBER FIVE: THE MARKET MANIPULATOR WILL ALWAYS TRY TO GET YOU TO BUY AT THE HIGHEST, AND SELL AT THE LOWEST PRICE POSSIBLE."

Just as the manipulator will use every available means to invite you to "the party," he will savagely and brutally drive you away from "his stock" when he has fleeced you. The first falsehood you assume is that the stock promoter WANTS you to make a bundle by investing in his company. So begins a string of lies that run for as long as your stomach can take it.

 

You will get the first clue that "you have been had" when the stock stalls at the higher level. Somehow, it ran out of steam and you

are not sure why. Well, it ran out of steam because the market manipulator stopped running it up. It's over inflated and he can't

convince more people to buy. The volume dries up while the share price seems to stall. LOOK AT THE TRADING VOLUME, NOT THE SHARE PRICE! When earlier, there may have been 500,000 shares trading each day for eight out of 12 trading days (as in the case of Software Control Systems), now the volume has slipped to 100,000 shares (or so) daily. There are some buyers there, enough for the manipulator to continue dumping his paper, but only so long as he can enlist one or more individuals/services to bang his drum.

 

He may continue feeding the promo guys a string of "promises" and "good news down the road." (Believe me, this HAS happened to me!) But, when the news finally arrives, the stock price goes THUD! This is entirely orchestrated by a market manipulator. You'll see it in the trading volume, most of which is CONTRIVED. A market manipulator will have various brokers buying and selling the stock to give the APPEARANCE of increasing volume and price so that YOU do start chasing it higher.

 

At some point during the stall stage, investors get fed up with the non-performance of the stock. It drifts for a while, in a steady retreat, with perhaps a short-lived spike in price and volume (the final signal that the manipulator has finally offloaded ALL of his

paper). Then, the stock comes tumbling down -- having lost ALL of the earlier share appreciation.

 

Sometimes, with the more cruel manipulators, they will throw in a little false hope... giving you a little more rope so they can better

hang you. Just after a severe drop, there will be a "bottom fishing" announcement which sends the share price up a bit on high volume, rises a little more after that and then continues to drift. Meanwhile, you keep getting "shaken out" through a cruel drip-drip water torture of the share price's slow retreat. Again, virtually every movement is completely orchestrated.

 

 

The Deadly Art Of Stock Manipulation Pt3

________________________________________

"RULE NUMBER SIX: IF THIS IS A REAL DEAL, THEN YOU ARE LIKELY TO BE THE LAST PERSON TO BE NOTIFIED OR WILL BE DRIVEN OUT AT THE LOWER PRICES."

 

Like Jesse Livermore wrote, "If there's some easy money lying around, no one is going to force it into your pocket." The same

concept can be more clearly understood by watching the tape. When a market manipulator wants you into his stock, you will hear LOUD noises of stock promotion and hype. If you are "in the loop," you will be bombarded from many directions. Similarly, if he wants you out of the stock, then there will be orchestrated rumors being circulated, rapid-fired at you again from many directions. Just as good news may come to you in waves, so will bad news.

 

You will see evidence of a VERY sharp drop in the share price with HUGE volume. That is you and your buddies running for the

exits. If the deal is really for real, the market manipulator wants to get ALL OF YOUR SHARES or as many as he can... and at the lowest price he can. Whereas before, he wanted you IN his market, so he could dump his shares to you at a higher price, NOW when he sees that this deal IS for real, he wants to pay as little as possible for those same shares... YOUR shares which he wants to you part with, as quickly as possible.

 

The market manipulator will shake you out by DRIVING the price as low as he can. Just as in the "accumulation" stage, he wants

to keep everything as quiet as possible so he can snap up as many of the shares for himself, he will NOW turn down, or even turn off, the volume so he can repeat the accumulation phase.

 

In the mining business, there seems to always be another "area play" around the corner. Just as Voisey's Bay drifted into oblivion,

during the fourth quarter of 1995 and early into 1996, the same Voisey Bay "wannabees" began striking deals in Indonesia. Some

even used new corporate entities. Same crooks, different shingles. The accumulation phase was TOP SECRET. The noise level was deadingly silent. As soon as the insiders accumulated all their shares, they let YOU in on the secret.

 

"RULE NUMBER SEVEN: CONVERSELY, YOU WILL OFTEN BE THE LAST TO KNOW WHEN THIS DEAL SHOWS SIGNS OF FAILURE."

 

Twenty-twenty hindsight will often show you that there was a "little stumble" in the share price, just as the "assays were delayed"

or the "deal didn't go through." Manipulators were peeling off their paper to START the downslide. And ACCELERATE it. The quick slide down makes it improbable for your getting out at more than what you originally paid for the stock... and gives you a better reason for holding onto it "a little longer" in case the price rebounds. Then, the drifting stage begins and fear takes over. And unless you have serves of steel and can afford to wait out the manipulator, you will more than likely end up selling out at a cheap price.

 

For the insider, marketmaker or underwriter is obliged to buy back all of your paper in order to keep his company alive and maintain control of it. The less he has to pay for your paper, the lower his cost will be to commence his stock promotion again... at some future date. Even if his company has no prospects AT ALL, his "shell" of a company has some value (only in that others might want to use that structure so they can run their own stock promotion). So, the manipulator WILL buy back his paper. He just wants to make sure that he pays as little for those shares as possible.

 

"RULE NUMBER EIGHT: THE MARKET MANIPULATOR WILL COMPEL YOU INTO THE STOCK SO THAT YOU DRIVE UP ITS PRICE SHARES."

 

Placing a Market Order or Pre-Market Order is an amateur's mistake, typifying the US investor -- one who assumes that thinly

traded issues are the same as blue chip stocks, to which they are accustomed. A market manipulator (traders included here) can jack up the share price during your market order and bring you back a confirmation at some preposterous level. The Market Manipulator will use the "tape" against you. He will keep buying up his own paper to keep you reaching for a higher price. He will get in line ahead of you to buy all the shares at the current price and force you to pay MORE for those shares. He will tease you and MAKE you reach for the higher price so you "won't miss out." Miss out on what? Getting your head chopped off, that's what!

 

One can avoid market manipulation by not buying during the huge price spikes and abnormal trading volumes, also known as

chasing the stock to a higher price.

 

"RULE NUMBER NINE: THE MARKET MANIPULATOR IS WELL AWARE OF THE EMOTIONS YOU ARE EXPERIENCING DURING A RUN UP AND A COLLAPSE AND WILL PLAY YOUR EMOTIONS LIKE A PIANO."

 

During the run up, you WILL have a rush of greed which compels you to run into the stock. During the collapse, you WILL

have a fear that you will lose everything... so you will rush to exit. See how simple it is and how clear a bell it strikes? Don't think this formula isn't tattooed inside the mind of every manipulator. The market manipulator will play you on the way up and play you on the way down. If he does it very well, he will make it look like someone else's fault that you lost money! Promise to fill up your wallet? You'll rush into the stock. Scare you into losing every penny you have in that stock? You'll run away screaming with horror! And vow to NEVER, ever speculate in such stocks again. But many of you still do.... The manipulator even knows how to bring you back for yet another play.

 

What actors! No wonder Vancouver is sometimes called

"Hollywood North."

"FINAL RULE: A NEW BATCH OF SUCKERS ARE BORN WITH EVERY NEW PLAY."

 

The Financial Markets are a Cruel, Unkind and Dangerous Playing Field, one place where the newest amateurs are generally

fleeced the most brutally.... usually by those who KNOW the above rules.

 

Just as I have a duty to ensure that each of you understand how this game is played, YOU now have that same duty to guarantee

that your fellow speculator understands these rules. Just as I would be a criminal for not making this data known to you, YOU would be just as criminal to keep it a secret. There will always be an unsuspecting, trusting fool whom the rabid dogs will tear to shreds, but it does NOT have to be this way.

 

IF every subscriber made this essay broadly known to his friends, acquaintances and family, and they passed it on to their

friends, word of mouth could cause many of these market manipulators to pause. IF this effort were done strenuously by many,

then perhaps the financial markets could weed out the crooked manipulators and the promoters could bring us more legitimate

plays.

 

The stock markets are a financing tool. The companies BORROW money from you, when you invest or speculate in their companies. They want their share price going higher so they can finance their deal with less dilution of their shares... if they are good guys. But, how would you feel about a friend or family member who kept borrowing money from you and never repaid it? That would be theft, plain and simple. So, a market manipulator is STEALING your money. Don't let him do it anymore. Insist that the company in which you invest be honest or straight... or find another company in which to

speculate. Your money talks in LOUDER volumes than any stock promotion scheme. ALWAYS refuse any deal which smells wrong.

 

Refuse to tolerate the scams prevalent in the financial markets. This can ONLY be accomplished by KNOWING and USING the above rules. Thoroughly COMPLETE your due diligence on a company before risking a dime. Dig up the Insider Reports to find out who is blowing out their paper, how often they are blowing out their paper and whatever happened to their "last play."

 

Begin to use this as YOUR rule of thumb: If the insider's paper is really worthless, then avoid it. Find another's whose paper DOES

hold promise and honest possibilities. In these small cap stock markets, you are investing more in the INDIVIDUAL behind the play, than the "possibility" of the play itself. Ask yourself before speculating: Could I lend this person $5,000 for a year and hope to

get it back? If not, then don't! Do it for your own good and the good of everyone else who is so foolish as to speculate in these financial markets!

 

The truly sane and only somewhat safe solution to all of this: FIND GOOD COMPANIES IN WHICH TO SPECULATE AND GET INTO THEM AT THE GROUND FLOOR LEVEL. Anything else is criminal or stupid. This is a case where there really isn't a gray area. It's either

Black or it's White. The company and its management are scamsters

or they really intend to bring value to their shareholders.

 

 

What is Circular Trading

 

Circular Trading is a fraudulent activity in the stock market involving two brokers or market players trading a stock back and forth to give the impression of huge trading volume.

 

In Circular Trading sell orders are entered by a broker who knows that offsetting buy orders, the same number of shares at the same time and at the same price, either have been or will be entered.

 

Circular trading is typically rampant in a market that is tending upwards. The problem is that retail investors trade on momentum. This means that these investors enter the market when volumes are high; for high volumes are perceived to mean higher market interest and therefore higher prices.

 

The trouble starts when the market players who engage in circular trading decide to offload their holdings, sending the stock into a tailspin. Should retail investors get stuck with such stocks, the total money flow into the market will reduce. And that could be some cause for concern for the economy as a whole. The reason is that vibrant markets can propel economic growth, if they sustain for a long while. It is to prevent circular trading and, perhaps, its consequences that the stock exchange has shifted certain stocks to the trade-for-trade segment.

 

What is Trade-for-trade?

 

Under the trade-for-trade segment, every transaction is individually settled. Suppose a trader buys 1,000 shares of a stock for Rs 45 per share in the morning and sells the same quantity of shares in the afternoon for Rs 50 per share. Under the rolling settlement system, the broker is permitted to net the buy and sell transactions, and pay Rs 5 per share less brokerage to the trader.

 

In the trade-for-trade segment, the trader will have to pay Rs 45,000 to take delivery of the 1,000 shares bought, and will have to make delivery for the shares sold. Since each transaction is treated separately, scope for circular trading is restricted. The reason is that trader ramping up the stock price will have to pay the amount to take delivery of the shares bought. And that would entail large outlays.

 

The trade-for-trade segment appears a good measure to lower the systemic risk due to circular trading. The stock exchanges should, hence, actively consider shifting stocks to this segment rather than slapping special margins on the stocks considered speculative.

 

Now the BSE routinely raises the special margin on stocks based on some undisclosed criteria to deter speculative trading. But it is not effective in a vibrant market because retail investors enter in droves in stocks based on momentum; and such speculative stocks carry high momentum.

 

That said, shifting stocks to the trade-for-trade segment would help contain systemic risk better if the stock exchanges are more transparent in their criteria for choosing such stocks.

 

Transparency: At present, neither the BSE nor the NSE states the criteria for shifting a stock to the trade-for-trade segment. Defining the basis for such a shift would provide a perspective for traders and retail investors of the quality of trading in each stock.

 

Suppose the exchanges state that they consider stocks with delivery-to-traded quantity ratio of less than 10 per cent, and price change of more than 50 per cent in a week for shifting to the trade-for-trade segment.

 

Traders and investors will keep hawk-eye on stocks that fit such a criteria (such an information can be obtained from the NSE Web site). This will prevent retail investors from getting trapped in stocks that are victims of circular trading. Such transparency is important because stocks may decline in value after they are shifted to the trade-for-trade segment because of a likely drop in volumes.

 

In short, the BSE and the NSE should actively consider shifting stocks to the trade-for-trade segment as a measure to curb circular trading. Importantly, the exchanges should be transparent in their criteria for choosing such stocks.

 

 

http://www.traderji.com/trading-psychology...lation-pt1.html

 

MORE: George Chelekis - Essays On Stock Market Manipulation

  • Răspunsuri 49
  • Citiri 40,8k
  • Creat
  • Ultimul Răspuns

Top autori în acest subiect

Featured Replies

Postat
  • Autor

Billions for Bankers - Debts for the People

by Sheldon Emry

 

Contents:

1.Introduction

2.Prologue: Three Types of Conquest

3.The Real Story of Money Control in America

4.Money is "Created", Not Grown or Built

5.Bankers' Depression of the 1930's

6.No Money for Peace, but Plenty for War

7.Power to Coin and Regulate Money

8.How We Lost Control of the Federal Reserve

9.Billions in Interest Owed to Private Banks

10.Manipulating Stocks for Fun and Profit

11.The Tyranny of Compound Interest

12.Our Own Debt is Spiraling into Infinity

13.Gambling Away the American Dream

14.Continuing Cycles of Debt and War

15.Every Citizen Can Be A Stock Holder in America

16.Citizen Control of U.S. Currency

17.Creating a Debt-Free America

18.Controlling Public Debate and Opinion

19.Spread the Word and Do Something to Fix Things

20.QUOTES - FROM PROMINENT PEOPLE

21.WHAT YOU CAN DO

 

10. Manipulating Stocks for Fun and Profit

 

In addition to almost unlimited usury, the bankers have another method of drawing vast

amounts of wealth. The banks who control the money at the top are able to approve or

disapprove large loans to large and successful corporations to the extent that refusal of a

loan will bring about a reduction in the selling price of the corporation's stock.

After depressing the price, the bankers' agents buy large blocks of the company's stock.

Then, if the bank suddenly approves a multi-million dollar loan to the company, the stock

rises and is then sold for a profit. In this manner, billions of dollars are made with which to

buy more stock. This practice is so refined today that the Federal Reserve Board need

only announce to the newspapers an increase or decrease in their "discount rate" to send

stocks soaring or crashing at their whim.

Using this method since 1913, the bankers and their agents have purchased secret or

open control of almost every large corporation in America. Using this leverage, they then

force the corporations to borrow huge sums from their banks so that corporate earnings

are siphoned off in the form of interest to the banks. This leaves little as actual "profits"

which can be paid as dividends and explains why banks can reap billions in interest from

corporate loans even when stock prices are depressed. In effect, the bankers get a huge

chunk of the profits, while individual stockholders are left holding the bag.

The millions of working families of America are now indebted to the few thousand banking

families for twice the assessed value of the entire United States. And these Banking

families obtained that debt against us for the cost of paper, ink, and bookkeeping!

 

Later edit:

 

This practice is so refined today that the Federal Reserve Board need only

announce to the newspapers an increase or decrease in their "discount rate"

to send stocks soaring or crashing at their whim.

 

And the FOREX also! :biggrin:

Editat de tavi_star

Postat

as mai da 5 stele acestui topic dar nu pot

Postat
  • Autor

The Rothschild Bloodline

 

"Give me control of the economics of a country; and I care not who makes her laws."

Amsel Rothschild is reported to have said.

 

Today his descendents meet twice daily in London to dictate to the world what the world price of gold will be.

 

They also dictate what the "Federal Reserve System" will do with America’s finances.

Editat de tavi_star

Postat

nici nu stiu ce-as putea sa mai comentez. incredibil.

  • 1 lună mai târziu...
Postat
  • Moderators

Fain, fain de tot! Genial! Bravo Tavi! (cu majuscula)

 

Tocmai am primit de la GN tzidula saptamanala, care se leaga perfect, iar

cartea recomandata inauntru, well, pare must to read.

Eu m-am apucat de ea deja

 

Garry North Reality Check

Issue 750 May 2, 2008

 

SIEGFRIED & ROY & BERNANKE

 

Siegfried & Roy were one of Las Vegas's most popular

acts until 2003, when Roy Horn, the trainer of big cats,

was attacked by a tiger. He has still not recovered.

 

Siegfried was an illusionist. We call these people

magicians, but the magic they employ is illusion.

 

The more I think of it, the more I see Ben Bernanke as

the replacement for Siegfried & Roy. The show must go on.

 

 

THE ILLUSIONIST

 

The illusionist relies on his ability to get the

audience to look at one thing while he manipulates

something else.

 

The stage illusionist doesn't harm anyone. Any

illusionist who harmed people would be written out of the

guild. That's why the Federal Reserve has never been able

to gain membership, despite its consummate mastery at

getting the audience to look somewhere else than where the

FED is doing the manipulating.

 

On Wednesday, April 30, the Federal Open Market

Committee met to decide if it should announce another

reduction in the target rate for Federal Funds, the rate at

which American banks lend money overnight to each other.

 

Wall Street had predicted that the rate cut would be

minimal: a quarter of a percentage point (25 basis points).

All day, the Dow Jones Industrial Average slowly rose by

145 points. Then, as soon as the FOMC announced its

expected reduction, the market fell. It closed down almost

12 points.

 

In previous sessions, the Dow had soared several

hundred points upon the FOMC's announcement, only to fall

back the next day or by the end of the week. This time,

sellers wasted no time. The shot in the arm didn't work at

all this time.

 

The FOMC published its usual press release. It

admitted what everyone suspects: slow growth ahead.

 

Recent information indicates that economic

activity remains weak. Household and business

spending has been subdued and labor markets have

softened further. Financial markets remain under

considerable stress, and tight credit conditions

and the deepening housing contraction are likely

to weigh on economic growth over the next few

quarters.

 

The FED's approach has always been to accent the

positive. When the positive is barely visible, the FED

emphasizes as much of it as it can.

 

Economic growth never departs entirely in a FED

announcement. Whenever economic growth plays hide and go

seek, the FED announces, "We can see you! You can't hide

from us!"

 

Look at the words in the announcement: "weak,"

"subdued," "softened," "considerable stress." This is

indicative of an economy under pressure, but not in

recession today.

 

Then there is the familiar refrain, which is rarely

absent from any FED announcement.

 

Still, uncertainty about the inflation outlook

remains high. It will be necessary to continue to

monitor inflation developments carefully.

 

Year after year, decade after decade, the FED

continues to monitor price inflation. Price inflation does

not go away. It seems to exist in order to make work for

Federal Reserve statisticians. Entire careers are devoted

to monitoring price inflation. "There's always more where

that came from!" And there almost always is.

 

The key to a successful illusion is the illusionist's

ability to get the audience to focus its attention on

something peripheral. That's why he uses a wand. Or he

may wave his hands in some flashy way. "The action is over

here." No, it isn't. Let me show you how this works.

 

The substantial easing of monetary policy to

date, combined with ongoing measures to foster

market liquidity, should help to promote moderate

growth over time and to mitigate risks to

economic activity.

 

"Yes, sir, watch the easing of monetary policy." They

mean: "Watch our announcement that it's there."

 

I prefer to watch the FED's figures on monetary policy

rather than the FED's official press releases. The FED can

control only one monetary aggregate directly: the monetary

base. It buys, sells, or holds assets that serve as a

legal reserve for the nation's commercial banks.

 

The adjusted monetary base comes closer than any other

monetary aggregate to revealing Federal Reserve policy.

Thus, as the grand master of American illusion, Chairman

Bernanke wants the audience to pay no attention to it.

 

In March, 2007, Congressman Ron Paul sent a letter to

the Federal Reserve asking three questions:

 

How can the money supply increase at a rate three

times that of the monetary base?

 

What is the source of the additional reserves

that do not show up in the monetary base figures?

 

Because this has happened, according to the data,

how does FOMC policy affect the actual money

supply today?

 

Federal Reserve Chairmen do not appreciate these sorts

of direct questions. So, they employ various techniques of

verbal evasion. In his reply of March 28, Chairman

Bernanke adopted an academic variation of Alan Greenspan's

FedSpeak. You can read his reply. It is masterful. It

does not answer the questions, of course. But is surely

lets us see a master illusionist at work.

 

Every reporter in the financial press should read this

letter. They should all press him:

 

What is the function of the monetary base, if not

to control the legal reserves of the banking

system?

 

Then they should ask this question:

 

Can the banking system as a whole create credit

independently of the monetary base?

 

Then they should ask this question:

 

If the banking system can create credit

independently of the monetary base, how can the

Federal Reserve System control monetary policy?

 

They will not do this. Why not? Because (1) they do

not understand money and banking; (2) they do not read my

reports.

 

Without the widespread mystery of central banking, the

illusion could not go on. The best cure for this illusion

is the money and banking textbook by economist Murray

Rothbard, "The Mystery of Banking." You can download it

for free here.

 

http://www.mises.org/Books/mysteryofbanking.pdf

 

Let us return to the FOMC's assertion:

 

The substantial easing of monetary policy to

date, combined with ongoing measures to foster

market liquidity. . . .

 

I ask: "What easing of monetary policy?" Where is the

evidence of such easing? The adjusted monetary base

figures reveal a year-to-year increase of less than 1%.

This is tight money by any post-1932 definition of monetary

policy.

 

Now let us look at the "ongoing measures to foster

market liquidity." These policies are (1) swapping

marketable assets in the FED's portfolio for less

marketable assets in the largest banks and brokerage firms'

portfolios; (2) announcing an implied promise to provide

liquidity -- fiat money -- by announcing reductions in the

FedFunds target rate.

 

The illiquidity in the system comes from the banks'

distrust of each other's solvency. The problem is looming

insolvency, not illiquidity.

 

This leads us to the second aspect of the performance:

the big cats.

 

 

RIDING THE TIGER

 

Roy Horn suffered from an illusion. He thought he was

in charge of his tigers. Most of the time, he seemed to be

in charge. This illusion ended in a spectacular fashion.

 

The trouble with wild animals is that they are wild.

They may cooperate with a trainer for a time. The trainer

provides tasty rewards. For a time, the animals figure

that the treats taste better than the trainer. Then,

without warning, one of them changes its mind.

 

All central bankers go on stage and perform just as

Roy Horn performed. They snap their whips. They develop

entertaining patter. Thy provide the sense of being in

control.

 

They are dealing with wild animals: entrepreneurs.

Entrepreneurs try to forecast future market conditions.

They make money when they forecast correctly. They lose

money when they don't. Unlike central bankers, they put

their money, or their clients' money, where their mouths

are.

 

As capital markets grow more complex, central bankers

are like wild animal trainers who keep adding wild cats to

the line-up. They snap their whips, but all it takes is

one big cat -- or fat cat -- to gobble them up. George

Soros is such a big cat. He called the joint bluffs of the

Bank of England and the Bank of Malaysia in 1992 and made

an estimated $4 billion at their expense.

 

The complexity of today's international capital

markets is beyond the ability of any computer program,

committee, or central banker to understand. Central

bankers call meetings, issue press releases, and announce

non-existent policies, and they expect the markets to fall

in line.

 

One of these days, the chairman of the Federal Reserve

System is going to get mauled. So are all those investors

who put their money where the Chairman's mouth is.

 

The press release also assured us that "The Committee

will continue to monitor economic and financial

developments and will act as needed to promote sustainable

economic growth and price stability." When a press release

includes such meaningless, self-serving bluster as this,

think of Roy Horn on-stage, going "Nice kitty. Nice

kitty."

 

The tiger got a grip on Roy Horn's head and dragged

him around the stage. I predict that someday, the capital

markets are going to grab Ben Bernanke by the beard and

drag him around the stage.

 

 

ILLIQUIDITY OR INSOLVENCY

 

Franklin Sanders says that the Federal Reserve has

only two tools: inflation and blarney. Bernanke has added

another: asset swaps.

 

William Poole, the recently retired president of the

St. Louis Federal Reserve, made this statement before he

retired. "As I have emphasized before, the Federal Reserve

can deal with liquidity pressures but cannot deal with

solvency issues."

 

Under Bernanke, the FED has had to deal with

insolvency issues. He has convinced his peers to adopt a

policy of asset swaps. The Federal Reserve System

exchanges low-risk Treasury debt to struggling large banks

and large financial institutions in exchange for AAA-rated

assets that no one believes are AAA-safe. This keeps the

borrowing institutions from having to reveal on their

accounting sheets that they are holding capital of less

than book value.

 

This practice is legal. It is short-term. It doesn't

yet have answers to these questions:

 

What will happen if the AAA-rated paper doesn't

recover, because the capital markets for these

assets do not recover?

 

How long can these 28-day swaps go on, when the

borrowing institutions must pay interest to the

FED for the swap?

 

What markets will the FED-borrowing institutions

lend to in order to get enough profit to keep

paying the FED?

 

What happens when the FED at last inflates,

Treasury rates rise, and the FED-borrowing

institutions owe higher interest payments to the

FED for the borrowed Treasury debt?

 

The policy can continue for as long as (1) The FED has

Treasury debt to swap (about $750 billion remaining), and

(2) Treasury interest rates remain low.

 

The FED is dealing with insolvency directly. It is

not dealing with illiquidity directly. It has intervened

to convince those banks with more solid balance sheets to

lend overnight to banks with questionable balance sheets.

 

The bankers know the score. They know that American

major banks are on the edge of bankruptcy, just as British

banks are. (This is why all information on which banks are

involved in the Bank of England's $100 billion asset swaps

is locked up for the next 30 years.) They don't want to

lend to these banks.

 

The FED is not supplying the banking system with

liquidity. It is instead providing public band-aids for

banks facing insolvency or at least a contraction of their

lending ability due to reduced balance sheets. The FED is

trying to persuade decision-makers in an illiquid

commercial banking system that the FED stands ready to bail

out any toppling firm whose bankruptcy threatens the entire

payments system with gridlock. This is what Greenspan a

decade ago called cascading cross defaults.

 

Almost ten years ago to the day, Alan Greenspan gave a

speech before the 34th Annual Conference on Bank Structure

and Competition of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. He

warned:

 

To be sure, we should recognize that if we choose

to have the advantages of a leveraged system of

financial intermediaries, the burden of managing

risk in the financial system will not lie with

the private sector alone. As I noted, with

leveraging there will always exist a possibility,

however remote, of a chain reaction, a cascading

sequence of defaults that will culminate in

financial implosion if it proceeds unchecked.

 

That was the threat in 1998. It remains an even

greater threat today. So, how can society deal with this

threat?

 

Only a central bank, with its unlimited power to

create money, can with a high probability thwart

such a process before it becomes destructive.

Hence, central banks will of necessity be drawn

into becoming lenders of last resort.

 

In short, "Nice kitty. Nice kitty."

 

---------------------

 

CONCLUSION

 

We are all riding on the back of a highly leveraged,

debt-ridden tiger. We hope that Chairman Bernanke doesn't

get eaten alive. Why? Because the tiger will maul us

first.

  • 1 lună mai târziu...
Postat

Ei, Tavi, nu mai veni si tu cu astfel de scenarii pesimiste care sa ne faca sa nu mai investim niciun ban in pietele financiare ci doar sa savuram/cumparam carti si articole la baza carora stau autori care au ca tinta cititori ce sunt predispusi la a ramane usor uluiti de scenarii senzationale, iesite din comun si teorii ciudate.Mi-ai adus aminte de un individ care acum cca. doi ani in urma incerca sa ma convinga ca atentatele de la 11 septembrie 2001 au fost, vezi doamne, puse la cale tot de autoritatile americane pentru a avea motiv sa declanseze razboiul(energetic) asupra irak-ului; si chiar reusise sa ma convinga pe moment.Dupa vreo doua ore deja imi venea sa rad.

 

In fond, pietele financiare si, indeosebi cea bursiera la origine raman un mediu transparent,benefic societatii si economiei in general.Si orice investitor cumpatat/conservator poate obtine un randament satisfacator (acum glumesc, bineinteles).

 

Nu stiu daca era nevoie sa postezi atata informatie, orice persoana cu experienta de viata stie foarte bine ca absolut orice domeniu in care se castiga bani e full de escroci si alti concurenti rapace.Forexul nu face exceptie. Ma refer indeosebi la cei care vand cursuri,sau alte informatii de genul "5% fac profit constant, studiaza si ai toate sansele sa devii unul din ei"...

 

Apropo de scenarii din astea iesite din comun: anul trecut cand am vazut ca s-a intarit dolarul in urma acelor miscari gigant de pe forex indeosebi ,am fost ferm convins ca Federal Reserve impreuna cu cateva corporatii financiare americane de top le-au dat o lovitura de zile mari optimistilor pietelor emergente.Cateva luni mai tarziu l-am vazut pe George Bush tinand discurs la tv in incercarea de a calma investitorii.Criza creditelor "era pe bune".Concluzia e ca nici corporatiile mari nu pot evita pierderile cand pietele financiare se prabusesc precum un castel de carti.Ba chiar e mai rau pt. ele ca nu au unde varsa sume f. mari.Manipularea pietelor se cam lasa cu prabusirea sub propria greutate.Voi reveni asupra acestui subiect.SSIF broker cluj bombarda piata cu vesti bune prin februarie si actiunea se prabusea si mai tare.Cine pe cine manipula?

 

 

 

 

Billions for Bankers - Debts for the People

by Sheldon Emry

 

 

10. Manipulating Stocks for Fun and Profit

 

In addition to almost unlimited usury, the bankers have another method of drawing vast

amounts of wealth. The banks who control the money at the top are able to approve or

disapprove large loans to large and successful corporations to the extent that refusal of a

loan will bring about a reduction in the selling price of the corporation's stock.

After depressing the price, the bankers' agents buy large blocks of the company's stock.

Then, if the bank suddenly approves a multi-million dollar loan to the company, the stock

rises and is then sold for a profit. In this manner, billions of dollars are made with which to

buy more stock. This practice is so refined today that the Federal Reserve Board need

only announce to the newspapers an increase or decrease in their "discount rate" to send

stocks soaring or crashing at their whim.

Using this method since 1913, the bankers and their agents have purchased secret or

open control of almost every large corporation in America. Using this leverage, they then

force the corporations to borrow huge sums from their banks so that corporate earnings

are siphoned off in the form of interest to the banks. This leaves little as actual "profits"

which can be paid as dividends and explains why banks can reap billions in interest from

corporate loans even when stock prices are depressed. In effect, the bankers get a huge

chunk of the profits, while individual stockholders are left holding the bag.

The millions of working families of America are now indebted to the few thousand banking

families for twice the assessed value of the entire United States. And these Banking

families obtained that debt against us for the cost of paper, ink, and bookkeeping!

 

Later edit:

 

This practice is so refined today that the Federal Reserve Board need only

announce to the newspapers an increase or decrease in their "discount rate"

to send stocks soaring or crashing at their whim.

 

And the FOREX also! =))

Off, unde as gasi si eu niste banci din astea sa cumpar si eu niste actiuni de-alea lor?Si nu de-ale companiilor aflate in dificultate financiara.A?

Postat

nu ma pot abtine... viata e complexa si are multe aspecte.

uite cum sta chestia cu 9/11... desi autoritatile au stabilit varianta oficiala, 11 septembrie este un episod controversat si ipoteza conspirationista nu se poate exclude; exista dovezi foarte serioase. poate nu as fi crezut acest lucru, dar de 5 ani de cind traiesc in USA am vazut, auzit, citit destule lucruri care sa ma puna in garda. nu e deloc de ris.

"big brother" exista si se manifesta din ce in ce mai puternic, in fiecare zi face un pas inainte...

 

Ei, Tavi, nu mai veni si tu cu astfel de scenarii pesimiste care sa ne faca sa nu mai investim niciun ban in pietele financiare ci doar sa savuram/cumparam carti si articole la baza carora stau autori care au ca tinta cititori ce sunt predispusi la a ramane usor uluiti de scenarii senzationale, iesite din comun si teorii ciudate.Mi-ai adus aminte de un individ care acum cca. doi ani in urma incerca sa ma convinga ca atentatele de la 11 septembrie 2001 au fost, vezi doamne, puse la cale tot de autoritatile americane pentru a avea motiv sa declanseze razboiul(energetic) asupra irak-ului; si chiar reusise sa ma convinga pe moment.Dupa vreo doua ore deja imi venea sa rad.

 

In fond, pietele financiare si, indeosebi cea bursiera la origine raman un mediu transparent,benefic societatii si economiei in general.Si orice investitor cumpatat/conservator poate obtine un randament satisfacator (acum glumesc, bineinteles).

 

Nu stiu daca era nevoie sa postezi atata informatie, orice persoana cu experienta de viata stie foarte bine ca absolut orice domeniu in care se castiga bani e full de escroci si alti concurenti rapace.Forexul nu face exceptie. Ma refer indeosebi la cei care vand cursuri,sau alte informatii de genul "5% fac profit constant, studiaza si ai toate sansele sa devii unul din ei"...

 

Apropo de scenarii din astea iesite din comun: anul trecut cand am vazut ca s-a intarit dolarul in urma acelor miscari gigant de pe forex indeosebi ,am fost ferm convins ca Federal Reserve impreuna cu cateva corporatii financiare americane de top le-au dat o lovitura de zile mari optimistilor pietelor emergente.Cateva luni mai tarziu l-am vazut pe George Bush tinand discurs la tv in incercarea de a calma investitorii.Criza creditelor "era pe bune".Concluzia e ca nici corporatiile mari nu pot evita pierderile cand pietele financiare se prabusesc precum un castel de carti.Ba chiar e mai rau pt. ele ca nu au unde varsa sume f. mari.Manipularea pietelor se cam lasa cu prabusirea sub propria greutate.Voi reveni asupra acestui subiect.SSIF broker cluj bombarda piata cu vesti bune prin februarie si actiunea se prabusea si mai tare.Cine pe cine manipula?

Editat de Scrat

Postat
  • Moderators

Mi-ai adus aminte de un individ care acum cca. doi ani in urma incerca sa ma convinga ca atentatele de la 11 septembrie 2001 au fost, vezi doamne, puse la cale tot de autoritatile americane pentru a avea motiv sa declanseze razboiul(energetic) asupra irak-ului; si chiar reusise sa ma convinga pe moment.Dupa vreo doua ore deja imi venea sa rad.

eu as fi zis asa:

 

Mi-ai adus aminte de un individ care acum cca. doi ani in urma incerca sa ma convinga ca atentatele de la 11 septembrie 2001 NU au fost, vezi doamne, puse la cale tot de autoritatile americane pentru a avea motiv sa declanseze razboiul(energetic) asupra irak-ului; si chiar reusise sa ma convinga pe moment. Dupa vreo doua ore deja imi venea sa rad.

 

vezi tu, parerile sunt impartite...

Postat

Nefiind suficient de informat incat sa-mi sustin ceva mai practic ideile, dar pentru ca vreau totusi sa-l "combat" pe scalper_bz si sa continui sa cred in existenta unor posibilitati nelimitate, am si eu cate ceva de zis...

-Economia e facuta de oameni. Oamenii nu sunt perfecti. Deci, economia asta e prin definitie imperfecta. Cine nu ma crede sa se gandeasca la arbitraj (dupa mine gauri in sistem care pot fi exploatate).

-Unii oameni sunt mai destepti ca altii. O adunatura de mai multi oameni destepti au potentialul de a fi mai destepti decat RESTUL. Ori asta inseamna ca grupul asta de oameni destepti poate gasi "gauri". Iar aceste gauri sunt cu atat mai mari cu cat oamenii astia au mai multe resurse (bani).

-Pe langa bani poate exista ca resursa puterea politica. Atat timp cat jumatate+1 oameni dintr-o tara considera ca un anumit om ii reprezinta, cati dintre ei credeti ca il vor asculta? Si avand puterea asta, cati credeti ca il vor asculta cand zice ceva fals? Probabil nu cu mult mai putini.

 

Si in final ceva practic. Ma uitam la PEI pe BVB. Actiunile firmei asteia (de petrol in fond deci cred ca are sediul ceva mai mare dacat un apartament), cu o capitalizare decenta, au crescut intr-o zi vreo 10% ca a cumparat cineva 2 actiuni. Din cateva sute de mii... Unde este rigoarea implacabila aici?

 

In fond, pietele financiare si, indeosebi cea bursiera la origine raman un mediu transparent,benefic societatii si economiei in general.

Departe de tot se afla originea aia... Eu nu simt ca ajut cu nimic SUA ca ii cumpar 1000USD sau UE ca ii cumpar 1000EUR. Nu e deloc benefic pentru ca in loc sa sustii ce ai cumparat vinzi imediat ce nu-ti convine (cum ajuti o companie daca ii vinzi actiunile cand incep sa scada? ma refer la actiuni cumparate anterior).

Editat de andrei_lint

Postat

Departe de tot se afla originea aia... Eu nu simt ca ajut cu nimic SUA ca ii cumpar 1000USD sau UE ca ii cumpar 1000EUR. Nu e deloc benefic pentru ca in loc sa sustii ce ai cumparat vinzi imediat ce nu-ti convine (cum ajuti o companie daca ii vinzi actiunile cand incep sa scada? ma refer la actiuni cumparate anterior).

Era doar o gluma, nu ti-ai dat seama?sau ai vrut doar sa ma "combati"?

Si...discutii despre "cat de destepti sunt politicienii","cine-i mai destept, sefu' sau angajatu'", sau "cei cu banii sunt idioti sau se comporta ca niste idioti doar ca sa creeze confuzie in mintea sarantocului"...se vor tot purta mult timp de aici incolo.

Alătură-te conversației

Poți posta acum și să te înregistrezi mai târziu. Dacă ai un cont, autentifică-te acum pentru a posta cu contul tău.

Vizitator
Răspunde la acest subiect...

Navigare recentă 0

  • Nici un utilizator înregistrat nu vede această pagină.

Informații Importante

Am plasat cookie-uri pe dispozitivul tău pentru a îmbunătății navigarea pe acest site. Poți modifica setările cookie, altfel considerăm că ești de acord să continui.

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.